This case could expand the court’s 2010 Citizens United decision, which overturned generations of anti-corruption campaign ...

Courtly Observations is a recurring series by Erwin Chemerinsky that focuses on what the Supreme Court’s decisions will mean ...

The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a case deciding the future of campaign finance — these are the standout moments.

Brennan Center for Justice Elections and Government Program Director Daniel Weiner talked about the Supreme Court oral arguments in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election ...

A legal fight could restore the state’s power to set its own limits on contributions to super PACs and encourage public financing.

In practice, that has meant more expert, technocratic leadership. It has meant more corporate regulation than Republicans ...

The court could also side with the NRSC and Republicans and strike down the coordinated spending limits – a move that would amount to one of the biggest changes in campaign finance law since the ...

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by President Donald Trump’s administration, to overturn a quarter-century-old decision and erase limits on how much ...

The court appears likely to issue a ruling notwithstanding arguments that the case is moot because of Vance's equivocation ...

Caps on election spending may become a thing of the past. Supreme Court is considering a Republican-led drive, backed by ...

The dispute before the court involved a Republican effort to lift limits on how much money political parties can spend in ...

Regulators have the authority to penalize false advertising. What they cannot do is enact rules so heavy that legitimate ads cannot run.